[Virtualacorn-list] VirtualRPC Speed Comparisons...
David Pitt
pittdj at pittdj.co.uk
Thu Oct 9 10:42:35 BST 2008
Roger Darlington <rogerarm at freeuk.com> wrote:
> On 8 Oct 2008, David Pitt wrote:
> > OS : Windows XP SP3 Processor : Intel Celeron 1.4GHz BogoMips
> > : 186
> >
> > OS : Vista Processor : Intel Core2Duo T7300 2GHz BogoMips :
> > 372
> >
> > ---------------------- Time to load 4MB jpeg in to Variations :-
> >
> > Iyonix - 20secs VRPC (Vista) - 5secs
>
> Do you mean load it into Variations as a picture to image process? With
> 3x3 views? or 5x5 views?
>
> Or time to load it into Variations as a slide show?
>
> So here are my timings for both situations:
>
> 4MB jpeg Into Variations as a image processing file, 3x3 views.: 5s
>
> 4MB jpeg into Variations as a slide (a ladscape format piccy into
> 1920x1200 screen, at 'scale fit' setting and into a RISCOS window (not
> straight onto a black screen): 3s.
>
> So, right away I seem to be at Variance with David Pitts result. My Iyonix
> seems to be 4x to 6x faster than his :-))
Oh no, variations in Variations!
I have confirmed my timings.
Roger, do you have Geminus on your machine? That went out of use here with
an NVidia card upgrade.
--
David Pitt
More information about the Virtualacorn-list
mailing list