[Virtualacorn-list] VirtualRPC Speed Comparisons...
Roger Darlington
rogerarm at freeuk.com
Thu Oct 9 16:00:02 BST 2008
On 9 Oct 2008, David Pitt wrote:
> Roger Darlington <rogerarm at freeuk.com> wrote:
>
>> On 8 Oct 2008, David Pitt wrote:
>> > OS : Windows XP SP3 Processor : Intel Celeron 1.4GHz BogoMips
>> > : 186
>> >
>> > OS : Vista Processor : Intel Core2Duo T7300 2GHz BogoMips :
>> > 372
>> >
>> > ---------------------- Time to load 4MB jpeg in to Variations :-
>> >
>> > Iyonix - 20secs VRPC (Vista) - 5secs
>>
>> Do you mean load it into Variations as a picture to image process? With
>> 3x3 views? or 5x5 views?
>>
>> Or time to load it into Variations as a slide show?
>>
>> So here are my timings for both situations:
>>
>> 4MB jpeg Into Variations as a image processing file, 3x3 views.: 5s
>>
>> 4MB jpeg into Variations as a slide (a ladscape format piccy into
>> 1920x1200 screen, at 'scale fit' setting and into a RISCOS window (not
>> straight onto a black screen): 3s.
>>
>> So, right away I seem to be at Variance with David Pitts result. My Iyonix
>> seems to be 4x to 6x faster than his :-))
>
> Oh no, variations in Variations!
>
> I have confirmed my timings.
>
> Roger, do you have Geminus on your machine? That went out of use here with
> an NVidia card upgrade.
Yes I do.
What is the significance of that question?
Are you suggesting I remove it?
Would mine be as slow as yours if I were to removed it?
--
Cheers
Roger
If you start nowhere, you'll finish up in the same place
More information about the Virtualacorn-list
mailing list