[Virtualacorn-list] VirtualRPC Speed Comparisons...

Roger Darlington rogerarm at freeuk.com
Thu Oct 9 16:00:02 BST 2008


On 9 Oct 2008, David Pitt wrote:
> Roger Darlington <rogerarm at freeuk.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 8 Oct 2008, David Pitt wrote:
>> > OS         : Windows XP SP3 Processor  : Intel Celeron 1.4GHz BogoMips
>> > : 186
>> > 
>> > OS         : Vista Processor  : Intel Core2Duo T7300 2GHz BogoMips   :
>> > 372
>> > 
>> > ---------------------- Time to load 4MB jpeg in to Variations :-
>> > 
>> > Iyonix       - 20secs VRPC (Vista) -  5secs
>> 
>> Do you mean load it into Variations as a picture to image process? With
>> 3x3 views? or 5x5 views?
>> 
>> Or time to load it into Variations as a slide show?
>> 
>> So here are my timings for both situations:
>> 
>> 4MB jpeg Into Variations as a image processing file, 3x3 views.: 5s
>> 
>> 4MB jpeg into Variations as a slide (a ladscape format piccy into
>> 1920x1200 screen, at 'scale fit' setting and into a RISCOS window (not
>> straight onto a black screen): 3s.
>> 
>> So, right away I seem to be at Variance with David Pitts result. My Iyonix
>> seems to be 4x to 6x faster than his :-))
> 
> Oh no, variations in Variations!
> 
> I have confirmed my timings.
> 
> Roger, do you have Geminus on your machine? That went out of use here with
> an NVidia card upgrade.

Yes I do.

What is the significance of that question?

Are you suggesting I remove it?

Would mine be as slow as yours if I were to removed it?



-- 

Cheers
Roger
If you start nowhere, you'll finish up in the same place




More information about the Virtualacorn-list mailing list